Great product and easy to take
I read that Jarrow's Ubiquinol was superior to many other brands - so decided to go with it and give it a try. I have not finished my first bottle yet. My husband and I both (in our 70's) are taking it as well as a man in his late 80's - I think to be fair we need a couple of months to give it our best review but so far, I have nothing bad to say - but the BEST thing I - for myself wish to shout - is that though it is a large capsule, I can bite into it, chew it, the outside dissolves easily and it has no disagreeable taste - so I never miss taking it. I do not swallow large tablets or caps easily - need to chew them to get them down with water or food. a BIG plus for me.
March 15, 2015
Because of my husband's age he takes Ubiquinol rather than CO-Q-10. He leaves the purchasing up to me. I look for quality before value. I trust Jarrow products. Jarrow has the quality, Swanson has the value. Prices are very competitive and the mail order service is unbelievable speedy. Ordering couldn't be easier. H.
January 12, 2013
It is great for a heart health.
I bought it 3 month ago by my daughter. I think it is very good for me.
May 5, 2015
A Truly "Advanced" Form of CoQ10
There are tons of CoQ10 products on the market (both ubiquinone and ubiquinol).
Most of them are nothing special, and dare I say ineffective.
But, QH-Absorb is indeed a superior, highly effective form of CoQ10. Thanks to ingredients that enhance it's cellular uptake, and protect the CoQ10 against oxidation inside the oil-based soft-gel capsule, this product truly delivers on its promise of increased CoQ10 levels.
I have recommended this product to many people, and they have either noticed a physical improvement, or had a blood test done that showed a dramatic increase in their blood levels of CoQ10.
Being in the supplement industry, I've seen hundreds of CoQ10 products.
I choose this product for my 84-year old mother from all of the others, because I've seen how much it has helped other individuals.
What more proof can one ask for?
January 6, 2015